Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Mohr

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, closing in favour of delete. I placed lesser weight on the keep !vote as it did not discuss how the article might meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

=[[Jack Mohr]]=

:{{la|Jack Mohr}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jack_Mohr Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jack Mohr}})

non notable. The refs are to his appearances, or to notices, or promotional, not substantial comment about him. There's no reason apparent in the bio why there should be any. But as someone who appears on talk shows, he needs publicity. DGG ( talk ) 16:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Weak keep - I saw him on television quite a bit (especially on Mad Money), most of the sources were CNBC clips, thought that adding all those might be redundant. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 18:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete at best and draft & userfy if needed as my searches only found several expected sources at News and browsers but nothing to convince a better applicably notable article. SwisterTwister talk 18:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 13:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.