Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Michael Pulliyattel
=[[Jacob Michael Pulliyattel]]=
:{{la|Jacob Michael Pulliyattel}} – (
:({{Find sources|Jacob Michael Pulliyattel}})
No indication he meets WP:BIO, and the few footnotes provided do not actually meet the requirements of WP:RS. Jayjg (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete This article is almost a CV or a resume. He doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or any other notability requirements that I have found. A google search for his english name yields a few sources; however, they are mostly local bios. Another search for his malayan name yielded fewer results. Ryan Vesey Review me! 00:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Just an ordinary clergyman, really. Would need to be a bishop or higher to be notable, since he fails WP:GNG. StAnselm (talk) 00:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Weak keep -- might just about be prominent enough to be notable to keep. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.