Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Quinn

:{{la|Jacqueline Quinn}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jacqueline_Quinn Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jacqueline Quinn}})

Regardless of notability, this article is a press release. I do not see how it can be reduced to an encyclopedic article, Every individual paragraph is individually promotional for er products and her causes. I dont think he we removed the fluff there would be anything left. The proper course is to delete and start over again from scratch. If AfC is to be any use at all, it would be to keep material like this out of WP DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

• Delete as promotional per WP:TNT, This is beyond copyediting into shape.TheLongTone (talk) 08:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

• Delete per above, Every sentence is promo & isn't really encyclopedic, All in all needs WP:BLOWNUP & redone again. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 15:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Snappy (talk) 16:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.