Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Dolman

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficiently clear consensus. I don't really see any useful merge. DGG ( talk ) 04:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

=[[Jade Dolman]]=

:{{la|Jade Dolman}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jade_Dolman Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jade Dolman}})

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 09:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

delete and oppose merge completely fails WP:BIO. completely unremarkable and not even worth merging. LibStar (talk) 10:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Keep/merge allow merge discussions to be concluded, Gnan garra 10:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

::Merge what? She once modeled at a fashion show. She teaches art. So what? Merge discussions on such obscure subjects seem mostly useless and mostly ignored. When not ignored they're flooded by fanboys and those with vested interests. AFDs get a broader and more varied audience. AFDs are not, contrary to your claim, disruptive and damaging. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Delete with no merge as there's nothing better for WP:CREATIVE, nothing convincing here. SwisterTwister talk 01:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete - searches did not turn up enough to show she passes WP:GNG, definitely doesn't pass WP:ENTERTAINER. Nothing to merge. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.