Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Ell

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 19:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

=[[Jade Ell]]=

:{{la|Jade Ell}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jade_Ell Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jade Ell}})

Non-notable musician. No indications that this musician has achieved any of the milestones listed at WP:MUSIC. No indications of any significant coverage needed for WP:GNG. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. The article asserts no claim of the subject's notability. N4 (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - coverage at Billboard [http://books.google.com/books?id=Pg0EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA9&dq=%22Jade%20Ell%22#v=onepage&q=%22Jade%20Ell%22&f=false][http://books.google.com/books?id=6A0EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA29&dq=%22jade+ell%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YIf6Uu2rBLKk2gXT7YHwCQ&ved=0CCgQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=%22jade%20ell%22&f=false][http://books.google.com/books?id=KwoEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65-IA13&dq=%22jade+ell%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Gof6UoK2IsGM8AGhr4GYAw&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22jade%20ell%22&f=false] and Allmusic [http://www.allmusic.com/artist/jade-ell-mn0002147421] is enough to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO #1.  Gong show 20:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


  • Keep - per evident Billboard coverage. satisfying MUSICBIO.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 06:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.