Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagadananda Goswami

:{{la|Jagadananda Goswami}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Jagadananda Goswami}})

• Not a notable individual. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 00:53, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 02:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete Keep -- per nom. Wikid^as© 12:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Keep, he was the guru of Jagannatha Dasa Babaji and a student of Krishna das Babaji; both are influential Gaudiya figures. Shii (tock) 08:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• I appreciate the work you put into creating this article - but - notability is not inherited. There are no reliable sources that attribute notability to this subject; as such, the article should be deleted. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

:Keep he is a notable historical figure in Vaishnavism! (User) Mb (Talk) 22:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

::Do you know of any reliable sources that discuss how this subject is notable? Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

:::I had to look for more sources, but he seems to be a notable Gaudia leader, and a historical figure if you dig deeper. I do for example find [http://books.google.com/books?ei=fdpPTZ6NHcm1hAfM4aGoDg&ct=result&id=HpX-KdbKC8sC&dq=Jagadananda+Gosvami&q=Jagadananda+#search_anchor] and there are many more. Also this one [http://books.google.com/books?id=yVHkAAAAMAAJ&q=Jagadananda+Goswami&dq=Jagadananda+Goswami&hl=en&ei=3ttPTZPSCs-ShAeCirmODw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAg] The name is also used for a contemporary saint of Caitanya Mahaprabhu which is confusing, but the saint should be included and there are other sources that mention his name, both in the sect and outside. --Wikid^as© 11:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

• Note These are not the same individuals. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• Keep: Article need more work, but person is important identity in the Gaudiya Vaishnavism.Bill william compton (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.