Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagdish Chaturvedi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Jagdish Chaturvedi]]=

{{ns:0|B}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Jagdish Chaturvedi}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jagdish_Chaturvedi Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jagdish Chaturvedi}})

Twinkling XfD after IP {{u|2401:4900:2503:1A19:4540:B6DA:8AC4:3DF8}} tried to ask for speedy deletion (albeit without knowing how to and somewhat butchering the page). IP's rationale was "The article is regrettably pure self promotion. The personality is not note worthy of encyclopedic inclusion. The article may be moved for deletion with immediate effect. The text in the article resembles to a great extent the text in the personality's personal webpage. Such self aggrandizement and promotion ought not to be entertained on an Encyclopedic Platform." Moral of the story: although I don't know if the IP read/was familiar with general notability guidelines, the IP was on to something, and this article may not meet notability (among other problems the article has). Your folks' thoughts? Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 06:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep The personality is a notable author and inventor and therefore should have a Wikipedia Page. The article has been edited to remove promotional content. External links have been removed. Reliable sources and unbiased facts have been included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikas222334 (talkcontribs) 07:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete There is no real indication of notability as a comedian, and the medical career does not seem to meet WP:PROF. DGG ( talk ) 04:08, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. Subject of the biography has received substantive coverage in publications such as [https://www.technologyreview.com/lists/innovators-under-35/2016/humanitarian/jagdish-chaturvedi/ MIT Technology Review], [https://www.fastcompany.com/3067200/chaturvedi-doctor-inventor-stand-up-comedy Fast Company], [https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/in-other-news/260816/bengaluru-doctor-makes-it-to-mits-innovators-list.html Deccan Chronicle], [https://www.thehindu.com/society/what-the-doctor-ordered/article25214218.ece the Hindu], [https://www.livemint.com/Science/pPAHMWoZHps3lmfIwlh2EN/Jagdish-Chaturvedi-the-doctor-behind-portable-ENT-endoscope.html LiveMint] and the [https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/meet-this-ent-surgeon-and-innovator-from-bengaluru-who-is-also-a-standup-entertainer/articleshow/59985665.cms Economic Times]. There has been more non-trivial coverage in the [http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-02-09/news/47149183_1_technology-innovation-device-fellows Economic Times] [https://web.archive.org/web/20140317014845/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-02-09/news/47149183_1_technology-innovation-device-fellows archive.org][https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/how-stanford-india-biodesigns-programme-is-revolutionizing-medical-device-innovation/articleshow/30066235.cms?from=mdr ET2] and [https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/city-startup-wins-tata-social-enterprise-challenge/article6806712.ece The Hindu]. Therefore, this article passes the muster at WP:BIO. It could do with some clean-up though. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 09:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

----

: The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.