Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Anstead

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 22:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Jaime Anstead]]=

:{{la|Jaime Anstead}} ([{{fullurl:Jaime Anstead|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Anstead}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Nonnotable actress with short resume playing mastly unnamed or first-named characters, judging only by the refs and sources, negligible third-party sourcing (and "racksandrazors.com" suggests what those sources are interested in.) Borderline speedy. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete - no indication that she or the films she appeared in are notable enough for inclusion here. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. The needle on the notability meter didn't even twitch. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete without prejudice. A [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Jaime+Anstead%22&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a search] finds she [http://www.crazyralph.com/intjaime.html exists], but the assertions in the article cannot currently be sourced. Yes, she's cute... but she as yet has not built up even a remote notability for Wikipedia. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 05:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.