Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Beckford

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

=[[Jake Beckford]]=

:{{la|Jake Beckford}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jake_Beckford Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jake Beckford}})

Article about a football who fails WP:GNG and doesn't have any proof that he played in a fully pro league. – Michael (talk) 01:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 01:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL (no professional appearances per [http://uk.soccerway.com/players/jake-beckford-edwards/162265/ Soccerway]) and also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 09:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - there's no evidence that he meets the general notability guidelines, and the assertion on his infobox that he has played 5 games for the senior squad cannot be verified; it's more likely those appearances were for the Railhawks U23 squad, which would not be enough to pass WP:NFOOTBALL (nor are his appearances for Costa Rica's U17 team). It's worth noting that he has been named in their senior squad for the upcoming season so he MAY make his professional début in the near future, but that's not enough to keep the article at this point in time. ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 09:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league (atleast according to soccerway) or represented his country at senior level, which means that the articles fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. No prejudice against recreation when one of the criteria is met. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:55, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:55, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:55, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.