Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Ejercito
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G5. ✗plicit 12:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
=[[:Jake Ejercito]]=
:{{la|1=Jake Ejercito}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Jake Ejercito}})
Jake Ejercito
Actor who does not satisfy general notability or acting notability. Article was created as draft, then declined by AFC reviewer, then moved to article space by author.
None of the three roles listed in the filmography are described as major roles in their own Wikipedia articles.
| class="wikitable"
! Role !! Major ? !! Comments | ||
| Sunday Noontime Live | No | Listed fifth as host |
| ASAP | No | Not found in list of performers |
| Marry Me, Marry You | No | Listed as a supporting role |
A check of the references shows that most of them are simply announcements that he has signed a contract with the largest agency in the Philippines. None of them come close to qualifying as significant coverage for general notability.
| class="wikitable"
! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary | ||||||
| 1 | ABS-CBN.COM | Appears to be a photo gallery | No | No | No | |
| 2 | ABS-CBN.COM News | Announcement of contract with agency | No | No | No | |
| 3 | ABS-CBN.COM News | Another announcement of signing contract with agency | No | No | No | |
| 4 | PEP-PH.COM | Another story about signing contract with agency | No | No | No | |
| 5 | Yahoo | Yet another story about signing contract with Star Magic agency | No | No | No |
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- delete a case of too soon-itis. author had been adviced that the subject may not meet notability guidelines for actors before they moved the draft to the main space. The same advice is applicable here. – robertsky (talk) 18:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Weak Keep: This actor was passes the WP:NBIO. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 00:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC){{small|Blocked sockpuuppet of {{np|ParillasAndrie}}. ✗plicit 12:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)}}- {{u|AnsrieJames9}}, just a note, in WP:NBIO, WP:NACTOR is a set of additional criteria that should be fulfilled on top of WP:BASIC as this article is primarily about the subject as an actor/entertainer. How does this article pass the criterias laid out in the guidelines? – robertsky (talk) 01:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NACTOR. Also, the author (AnsrieJames9) might be a possible sockpuppet of {{u|ParillasAndrie}}, where the sock master's editing habit have almost the same as the author and the name itself has the exact match on the user page. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 05:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
{{u|CruzRamiss2002}}, I'm not a sockpuppet user of ParillasAndrie, this is an owned account of Me. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 07:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::: You should be requesting an unblock from your original account. Using an additional account to bypass your block is called 'sockpuppetry' and will count against you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- {{comment}} The article is eligible for WP:G5 - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ParillasAndrie -- Cabayi (talk) 10:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.