Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Brausch

{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Brausch|padding=1px}}|}}

=[[James Brausch]]=

:{{la|James Brausch}} ([{{fullurl:James Brausch|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Brausch}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. This unreferenced WP:BLP should be deleted per WP:BURDEN. —S Marshall Talk/Cont 22:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 00:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. The lack of sources is a serious problem, and I don't think this passes WP:AUTHOR - there is no Gnews hit at all and his books are apparently self-published according to amazon [http://www.amazon.com/Internet-Business-Book-No-1/dp/0979530903] [http://www.amazon.com/Internet-Business-Book-No-2/dp/0979530911/] [http://www.amazon.com/Voice-Said-Obey-James-Brausch/dp/097953092X/]. Given the tone and the content, it might be WP:CSD G11 material, but I'm not very certain. Tim Song (talk) 22:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - Lack of coverage much less significant, no awards, no notability. --Marc Kupper|talk 07:43, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}}