Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Dormer Schneider

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[James Dormer Schneider]]=

:{{la|James Dormer Schneider}} ([{{fullurl:James Dormer Schneider|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Dormer Schneider}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Young artist with little notability per WP:CREATIVE. The only references are links to collaborators: none are non-trivial, third-party sources. freshacconci talktalk 21:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 21:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: There are barely any results in this [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=James+Dormer+Schneider&start=0&sa=N Google Search] (none of them show notability) and no sources in this [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=James+Dormer+Schneider Google News] search. Fails WP:CREATIVE. Schuym1 (talk) 22:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete not ready for an encyclopedia..Modernist (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.