Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James F. Williams (3rd nomination)

:{{la|James F. Williams}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_F._Williams_(3rd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|James F. Williams}})

Fails WP:GNG. Just a man with a job. Night of the Big Wind _talk 21:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. The sorry state of the article as nominated was because much of its previous text was a copyvio, and was removed in 2010 with little attempt to salvage any of it. A better basis for judging the subject's notability would be the biosketch that our previous article copied from, [http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/dean/bio.htm here]. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
• Keep. Dean of libraries is not an inherently notable position, and I can't find evidence of high academic impact for his publications. But in this case I think his wide service on various governing boards (not all of which have been restored to the article yet) and the 2002 medal are enough to carry the day. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:12, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:PROF criterion #2 (highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level); the medal is named after one of the founders of the ALA. In addition to that, I agree with David Eppstein about the accomplishments of the subject as a whole.--Eric Yurken (talk) 00:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.