Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James John Parker

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:15, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

=[[James John Parker]]=

:{{la|James John Parker}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|James John Parker}})

Failed political candidate from 2006! with no further claims to notability, fails any notability criteria you want to pick. Try WP:N. Fails that too. Jayron32 04:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 05:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete Simply does not meet our notability standards for politicians or anything else. Cullen328 (talk) 06:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete, just campaign promotion ("Jim Parker, in his traditional fashion, has bypassed the normal political process and has taken his message of hope to the thousands of people . . .") for a non-notable failed primary candidate. Clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN, as any coverage he received was minor, local run-of-the-mill political reporting. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete as non-notable politician, per WP:POLITICIAN. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.