Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James L. Enos

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nomination withdrawn. {{nacd}} (non-admin closure) Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

=[[:James L. Enos]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=James L. Enos}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=James L. Enos}})

No clear indication of notability. Being the first president of the National Teachers Association isn't enough. No significant coverage in cited sources. Before search found nothing significant. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Iowa. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Journalism, Iowa, New York, and Wisconsin. WCQuidditch 11:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Has anyone looked [https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22James+L.+Enos%22+-wikipedia in the possible book sources]? Bearian (talk) 02:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep. I expanded it from another source. The nominator's comment "Being the first president of the National Teachers Association isn't enough" seems to suggest that WP:GNG-based notability is based on significance of accomplishments. It is not. It is based on depth of reliable sourcing. I think the multi-page profile I added and the paragraph about him in the SUNY 1895 source are enough, for someone from that time. And as for accomplishments: president of what is now the National Education Association is significant, but far from his only accomplishment. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
  • PS I found another four pages of in-depth coverage of him in another source [Aurner 1924] and added it to the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Nomination withdrawn based on additional sources identified by David Eppstein - good work. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.