Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Russell Ivie

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[James Russell Ivie]]=

:{{la|James Russell Ivie}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Russell_Ivie Stats])

:({{Find sources|James Russell Ivie}})

Sourced almost entirely to primary sources, self-published sources. No indication of substantial coverage independent of the subject, outside discussions on various forums and genealogy sites. L Faraone 22:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete -- My problem is not that the subject is laergely based only on WP:self-published sources, but that he is so utterly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Non-notable; no independent sources. Miniapolis 15:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.