Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Devane

:{{la|Jamie Devane}} ([{{fullurl:Jamie Devane|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Devane}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable amateur player that has not yet played professionally- fails WP:N and WP:HOCKEY. Prod tag recently removed. The Dominator^Talk_Edits 21:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —Djsasso (talk) 11:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)}}
• Delete per prior precedent: Examples include 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and at least 25 other AfDs for similar players. When/If this player wins a major award or plays in a fully professional league, then this article can be recreated, until then, he is not notable per WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. -Pparazorback (talk) 02:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete If he does something notable, then can be re-added. Kaiser matias (talk) 04:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable amateur player who has yet to play professionally so fails to meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:N. Also fails WP:HOCKEY's guidelines for player notablity WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. Can be recreated when/if he plays professionally or otherwise achieves notability. This is just the typical creation of junior players days after they have been drafted which has been shown by consensus time and again to not be enough to satisfy notability. -Djsasso (talk) 11:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails to meet WP:ATHLETE, WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE and precedent. --Smashville^talk 13:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.