Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese voice option video games

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

=[[Japanese voice option video games]]=

:{{la|Japanese voice option video games}} ([{{fullurl:Japanese voice option video games|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese voice option video games}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable original research. Note that the deletion nomination is specifically because of non-notability. The sources provided have nothing to support the notability of the topic of the article, rather they are there to try to bolster the synthesis and OR present in the article. --Craw-daddy | T | 22:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —--Craw-daddy | T | 22:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Article is original research; it is a synthesis of a few sources and many unverifiable opinions to advance a point. Jappalang (talk) 22:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Non-encyclopedic prose (written like an essay, has rhetorical questions), no notable sources and original research. Atyndall93 | talk 02:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete as original research essay. I don't see how this could be improved or rewritten to become an encyclopedia entry. --DAJF (talk) 04:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete as original research, and non-notable subject in the first place. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 09:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom. This is an original research essay Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 14:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete for same reasons as above. Tozoku (talk) 23:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete: original research. Wikipedia is not place for essay. Zero Kitsune (talk) 00:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.