Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason LeBlond

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 05:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

=[[Jason LeBlond]]=

:{{la|Jason LeBlond}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jason_LeBlond Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jason LeBlond}})

Non-notable art curator. DoctorKubla (talk) 20:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete. Article has been orphaned for more than two years. If the person were notable, somebody would have inserted a link from another article. I may propose a deletion criterion. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

::That's a bad rule and not valid grounds for deletion. If you look in :Category:Orphaned_articles you'll find plenty of notable articles. Often these reflect systemic balance. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.