Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Deakins

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Jay Deakins]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Jay Deakins}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jay_Deakins Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jay Deakins}})

No indication that the individual is notable separately from the company. ... discospinster talk 20:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 20:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 20:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 20:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep - Added information about his notable invention of an all natural cleaning product that came to form the foundation of his company in 1987.https://books.google.com/books?id=1PdaAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Jay+Deakins%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22Jay+Deakins%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi75MX6gdvlAhUPq1kKHWB_Bz0Q6AEwAXoECAIQAghttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.191.511&rep=rep1&type=pdf Gscala945 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC) — Gscala945 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Keep - The addition of his notable invention makes this worth keeping. DeloreanTimeMachine (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete Per nom. Also blatant self promotion and potential COI. Fifthavenuebrands (talk) 09:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nom, and there's no indication that the company is especially notable either. Emeraude (talk) 12:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete clearly a paid promotional bio without any indication of GNG. I'm also not entirely sold his company meets notability standards. Best, GPL93 (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep The addition of his invention and formation of the charitable foundation makes him notable apart from the company and should not be deleted.--Dandkpeters (talk) 14:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)— Dandkpeters (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete Sources cited do not show notability. There is not any, how you say, indepth coverage of this individual except in primary sourced and/or PR write-ups. VVikingTalkEdits 14:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete - 3/5 sources in the article are local or topical and otherwise unreliable sources; the 4th is a passing mention in Entrepreneur and the 5th is a press release. That fails significant coverage. His cleaner invention is not so important as to allow for its own article - every year thousands of household products are patented. Bearian (talk) 17:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Added additional information and references on his numerous contributions to industry specific publications. Gscala945 (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete Non notable and the article is more like promotional bio - Jay (talk) 08:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.