Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Gubitz
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
=[[Jay Gubitz]]=
:{{la|Jay Gubitz}} – (
:({{Find sources|Jay Gubitz}})
Non-notable artist. This is basically an advertisement created in 2008 by his grandson, {{u|Bgubitz}} (no longer editing). — Scott • talk 11:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know. I've tried to be open and honest about this article and my potential bias. {{u|Bgubitz}} — Preceding undated comment added 16:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
:Please note that my comment wasn't intended to be rude - "non-notable" is editors' shorthand for "not meeting our notability standards", which are fairly strict. — Scott • talk 17:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete insufficient notability. eg. Glastar competition is something like wikipedia's "picture of the day", from a business. (no disrespect to artist who i find interesting.) - Altenmann >t 07:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Really cool stained glass work, that's for sure. But, I was unable to find any reliable secondary sources that establish this artist as a major figure in the art world. Really great work though. SarahStierch (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.