Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Dahm

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to State House elections in Michigan, 2008#District 56. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Jean Dahm]]=

:{{la|Jean Dahm}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Dahm}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Jean Dahm}})

The article contains multiple issues since it was first created. Two of the three external links in the article are dead, and the working one only vaguely mentions her name. A Google search showed very few results; the only one with any information is her staff page at her job, which is also a non-notable business in Monroe. Apparently, she's a political candidate who was defeated badly in one local election. The subject isn't notable or verifiable enough for an article. —№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė♫♪ 05:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

:*Delete Not quite per nom -- my experience with the external links was dissimilar (the one that works covers Dahm fairly extensively, devoting approximately half its contents to quotes from Dahm) -- but certainly per nom on the notability of this person in general. GNews and other searching doesn't turn up much of anything beyond the one working link, and this is not significant coverage at all. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 06:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Redirect to State House elections in Michigan, 2008#District 56 including a note that she was also the candidate in 2006 (which does not seem to have a page). The subject is not notable: she fails WP:POLITICIAN and the coverage is not sufficient for WP:GNG. But WP:POLITICIAN requires redirects for candidates as a "general rule" to preserve content and act as a viable search mechanism. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete - Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. - Galloglass 10:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete i am willing to extent presumptive notability to all major party candidates for national office , but not to such candidates for a state legislature, as is the case here. DGG ( talk ) 03:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Redirect per Mkativerata. Ray^Talk 04:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.