Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Schroeder and Jordan Lloyd
=[[Jeff Schroeder and Jordan Lloyd]]=
:{{la|Jeff Schroeder and Jordan Lloyd}} – (
:({{Find sources|Jeff Schroeder and Jordan Lloyd}})
Probably fails WP:BLP1E. Jeff Schroeder doesn't meet WP:N requirements. Article has deprodded twice and delete the article immediately. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 00:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - Jordan already has her own article, so there's no need for this. Yes, they are a duo from Big Brother who also played as a team on the Amazing Race, but claiming they're a notable enough couple for a duo article is too much of a stretch. If Jeff becomes notable someday, then this could become a Rob and Amber type of disambig, but not now. Tarc (talk) 14:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Do not Delete - Interest in Jeff and Jordan as a pair is still incredibly high, and despite the lack of info in regards to what Jordan has coming up, Jeff has a new job in the industry that will be announced within the next month that keeps him relevant enough to sustain this page. There are many other pages that are similar in nature in regards to reality couples that are allowed to exist well after their exit form the limelight. Jeff and Jordan have upcoming project in the works. Also it should be noted that majority of contributers who have proposed deletion or edited this article have done so out of some sort of spite agasint the original creator of the page, not out of a real sense of adhearing to wiki rules.hellataz (talk) 8:30, 10 May 2010
:*Attacking other editor's motives, claiming insider info about future events, "other stuff exists", etc...are not really valid reasons to keep a page. Tarc (talk) 13:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
:*There was no attack on other posters, I have personally seen other editors of this page on other boards joke and boast about how they want to mess with this page, soley because of who created it. And as for claiming insider knowledge, i have not done any such thing, all information is correctly labeled with notes, refrences and sources and if information was still deemed a rumor it was posted as such. Hellataz (talk) 11:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.163.93 (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete High interest in a current topic is NOT the same as criteria for an encyclopedia entry...delete... this belongs on a gossip site not Wikipedia—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephencdickson (talk • contribs) 12:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
:*There are similar pages to this one that are allowed to remain, well after the interest in their subjects have faded. This entry contains facts not gossip, it is a true account of the rise to fame of two very popular reality stars who happened to begin dating. Their story as well as their careers continue as you will see in updates if this entry is allowed to remain. I honestly don't see all the hub bub over one small entry when i've seen Wiki littered with som much other irrelevant entries that are not being attacked or proposed to be deleted. Hellataz (talk) 11:34, 15 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.163.93 (talk)
- Comment if the page is deleted, it will move from article to userfy page will name User:Hellataz/Jeff Schroeder and Jordan Lloyd. It's easy to cut and paste the userfy article. Jeff has less notability than Jordan and they are reality show participants. Tell the admins to cut and paste into User's page.ApprenticeFan work 05:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I really don't see why this needs it's own page. If Jordan and Jeff's relationship needs to mentioned at all, why not a section on Jordan's page? GreekSalad 08:29 16 May 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.