Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Eisenach

:{{la|Jeffrey Eisenach}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jeffrey_Eisenach Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jeffrey Eisenach}})

Apparently non-notable economist. Yes, he's testified in a lot of courts; but where is the extended, in-depth coverage of his achievements? He has modest, non-negligible, cites on Scholar. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (soliloquize) @ 18:57, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

---

• ????? What's going on? The entire article is blanked as a copyvio. I looked at the article it is said to copy, and do not see the copying. It either is a copyvio, or it is an AfD, but not both. And I do not see the copyvio justification. LaMona (talk) 14:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

::Please see the Duplicate Detector link I have posted on the talk page of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

---

Comment: Notability in Wikipedia is based on in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. There are none such in the article (LinkedIn, a blog page he wrote himself, the pages of a company where he works and a school where he teaches etc.). However, I may have overlooked something: I had thought that the Jeffrey Eisenach caught up in the ethics investigation of Newt Gingrich was a different person, since there is no mention of that, of GOPAC or of the PFF in the article. But [http://books.google.it/books?id=dZ8qAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Jeffrey+Eisenach%22&dq=%22Jeffrey+Eisenach%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=059bVOHtPNGradvZgPgM&ved=0CJcBEOgBMBo this source] seems to suggest they are one and the same. If so, I would imagine that that would make him notable by our standards. Thoughts, anyone? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (intone) @ 20:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

---

:Keep Meets WP:BIO, he has received significant coverage in multiple secondary sources, such as [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/09/14/why-verizon-and-att-are-more-innovative-than-the-left-thinks/] [http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/flights/2013/11/22/fcc-planes-phones-technology/3675327/] [http://articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/14/business/la-fi-fcc-net-neutrality-20140115] [http://www.npr.org/blogs/therecord/2013/08/29/214901688/can-streaming-services-make-money] Jinkinson talk to me 03:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

• Keep (pending copyvio clearance, ofc). Agree. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 00:42, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
• Withdraw nomination. What with the coverage of the Newt Gingrich scandal (assuming that that is in fact the same person) and the sources identified by {{u|Jinkinson}}, it doesn't seem there's much remaining doubt that this person is notable, so I'm withdrawing my nomination. The copyvio has been dealt with. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.