Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jejeebhoy baronets

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep; nominator has withdrawn nomination and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Jejeebhoy baronets]]=

:{{la|Jejeebhoy baronets}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jejeebhoy_baronets Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jejeebhoy baronets}})

No reliable third party source can be found. No scope for improvement. Benedictdilton (talk) 18:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Given that this is a list of articles, I'm not sure exactly what you're claiming. That most or all of them are unverifiable subjects? That seems quite incorrect just from taking a glance at [http://www.google.com/search?hl=&q=Jejeebhoy+baronet&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8#q=Jejeebhoy+baronet&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=p-KsUdCYNoigywHe5IDIAg&ved=0CA8Q_AUoAg&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.47244034,d.aWc&fp=be0a404a4c6e104&biw=1525&bih=707 this Google books search]; [http://books.google.com/books?id=R6oNt3M_yLgC&pg=PA361&dq=Jejeebhoy+baronet&hl=en&sa=X&ei=q-KsUaKCKObLyAGW2oHIAw&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Jejeebhoy%20baronet&f=false this book alone] appears to discuss a few of them. So this seems like a valid index to list those biographies together by their shared title at the very least, if not expandable into a separate article on the history of the title. postdlf (talk) 18:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
...and they're listed in [http://books.google.com/books?id=Pf8cAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1079&dq=Jejeebhoy+baronet&hl=en&sa=X&ei=q-KsUaKCKObLyAGW2oHIAw&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Jejeebhoy%20baronet&f=false Burke's peerage]. So please explain how you came to conclude that "no reliable third party source can be found." postdlf (talk) 18:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Ludicrous nomination. Kittybrewster ☎ 20:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Kindly remove this page from this list and close this AFD Benedictdilton (talk) 21:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.