Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Armstrong (writer)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Jennifer Armstrong (writer)]]=

:{{la|Jennifer Armstrong (writer)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jennifer_Armstrong_(writer) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jennifer Armstrong (writer)}})

DePRODed by creator without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: Does not meet criteria for 'any biography' or 'creative professionals' per WP:Notability (people). The sources provided are insufficient in number, depth, and scope to assert notability per WP:AUTHOR and some of them are primary sources and/or unreliable. Further searches have not provided articles about the subject in the established independent press. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

:Please see Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#Objecting. If the author objects to the deletion, and there is at least one source present that mentions the subject, the PROD template is allowed to be removed. While I am not expressing any viewpoints, your nomination statement is hardly accurate. Entertainment Weekly and the Los Angeles Times are clearly reliable sources, though I understand that you may feel they are inadequate. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete as PROD-er, per Notability (people). TRLIJC19 is quite right that there was nothing improper in removing the PROD. I disagree, though, that the cited sources are sufficient to establish notability. The first is Armstrong's own blog; the other two are biographical descriptions at Entertainment Weekly, where she works, and Huffington Post, where she has blogged; they are primary sources. (There is currently nothing cited from the Los Angeles Times.) Writers are deemed notable if they are widely cited by peers or successors, are known for originating a significant new concept, or have created a significant or well-known work. Additionally, a writer may satisfy general notability guidelines for academics or for biographies. I see no evidence that Jennifer Armstrong satisfies these criteria (but of course I am willing to be convinced). Cnilep (talk) 04:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete as per WP:Notability (people), and the above. Though the sources that are cited can be considered high-quality, one is a blog, and others a bio descriptions, just a note, this kinda also happened to one of my articles, which got deleted. TBr and ley 05:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete. I tried to find some sources for her and for her books, but the vast majority of what I could find are not the type that show notability. I did manage to find three sources that discuss her Mouseketeers book, but that's not enough to show that the book itself would have notability, let alone for the author. As far as her work as a journalist goes, there's nothing out there to show that she's had that large of an impact to where she'd pass notability guidelines on that front.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 04:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.