Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Jo-Brout

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

=[[Jennifer Jo-Brout]]=

:{{la|Jennifer Jo-Brout}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jennifer_Jo-Brout Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jennifer Jo-Brout}})

fails WP:BIO. Article was created by her collaborator and was badly sourced and promotional. I spent about two hours on this trying to fix it, and even now I am left with a bunch of WP:SPS - almost no independent sources that talk about her. I cannot justify this article's existence, and I tried. Jytdog (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Delete as per nominator. I found a [http://www.gulf-times.com/story/457163/Are-you-suffering-from-misophonia mention here] but we really need in-depth sources; if found, ping me, maybe I'll change my view.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF as far as I can tell. --bonadea contributions talk 13:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete per arguments above, also it seems to be the wish of the subject. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Delete. I think WP:GNG may be more appropriate than WP:PROF for someone who (according to [http://www.dukescience.org/people/brout]) is a school psychologist and activist rather than holding an actual academic position. Regardless, I'm not seeing enough independent coverage of her and her works for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.