Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Dimmick
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
=[[Jeremy Dimmick]]=
:{{la|Jeremy Dimmick}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Jeremy Dimmick}})
As an academic, he does not meet WP:PROF - he is a college lecturer at Oxford (not even a fellow of one of the colleges) and I cannot see evidence that his writings have had a significant impact. As a former child actor, he does not meet WP:NACTOR. Prod removed in 2008, and the situation is no better now than it was then. BencherliteTalk 09:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 15:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 15:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 15:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 15:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Sole source is IMDB. Uncontroversial delete. Agricola44 (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Uncontroversial delete; clearly not notable. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 21:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. There's probably enough here to save this from an A7 speedy deletion, but nothing in the article really asserts notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.