Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Shure

:{{la|Jeremy Shure}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jeremy_Shure Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jeremy Shure}})

Could not find secondary sources to support the notability of the subject under Wikipedia's standards. Capscap (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:{{comment}} A statement opposing deletion by the subject/author of the article is available here on the talk page. Capscap (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Capscap (talk) 14:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Lacks reliable sources, written as a self-promotional vehicle. 99.149.85.229 (talk) 15:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Blatant self-promotion. --Seduisant (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
• Delete. My gosh. See the talk page. This page should not be speedily deleted because this was built by a team in NY that is focused on my work. Not only does he have a COI, but he has a whole PR team working on this article? Notable or not, this kind of unapologetic blatant self-promotion warrants the article being deleted and salted to prevent re-creation. Let someone neutral propose it for creation at some other time. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOTCV. Not to mention the "you guys totally deserve my bio" attitude. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.