Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Navarro Elizalde

:{{la|Jerry Navarro Elizalde}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jerry_Navarro_Elizalde Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jerry Navarro Elizalde}})

PROD with the reasoning that "All references are self-published blogs that fail WP:RS." was removed. References are supposedly added but they still fail RS, or references doesn't actually refer to his work as an artist but on some other career, such as reference #8. Most of the articles is cited from the Wikipilipinas wiki, which fails WP:RS. –HTD 09:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - found references in news articles from the Philippines, but nothing substantial —Мандичка^YO 😜 09:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

• Narrow Keep The fuller list of shows etc at ref 9 suggests he has some national stature. Johnbod (talk) 13:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• Weak keep. He was probably a notable artist: for example, [http://www.philstar.com/modern-living/169792/jerry-navarro%C2%92s-shrine-love this article] in the Philippine Star describes "the late National Artist Jerry Elizalde Navarro" as "an intellectually astute and disciplined artist who helped father modern advertising in the Philippines, and was one of the key proponents in abstract painting." On the other hand, the current article gets his name backwards, and doesn't mention that he died in 1999, so we might need to take some care with the rest of its assertions. So this needs a good edit, or maybe it should get sent back to draft space until it's readier for prime time. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
• On the fence but maybe keep simply because sources confirm he exists and received somewhat attention. [https://www.google.com/search?q=Jerry+Navarro+Elizalde&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 Books] found results that say "National artist" also and [https://www.google.com/search?q=Jerry+Navarro+Elizalde&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1#q=Jerry+Navarro+Elizalde&tbm=nws&start=0 News] also with one saying that a workshop was named for him "annual Jerry Elizalde Navarro Workshop on Arts Criticism in Baguio City" with [http://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=Jerry+Navarro+Elizalde Highbeam] finding more results including one that says "pioneer artist". As is the case with most Filipino subjects, sources aren't always easy to find. SwisterTwister talk 20:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
• Keep I have a feeling that in recent years to the importance of the artist's need to write about it in the Washington Post, no less. The artist representing his country and heads of colleagues in their own country - it is a criteria for notability Shad Innet (talk) 10:35, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
• Comment from the nominator. The article is so badly written I hadn't realized that this person is dead. That changes things up a bit as unlike people who are alive, who'd benefit from some good old-fashioned promotion like the other "artists" I nominated, the benefit of promotion is nil. –HTD 01:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.