Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Imeson

:{{la|Jesse Imeson}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Jesse Imeson}})

Not suitable for inclusion per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:PERP. This material was more suited for Wikinews and the event and perp, while perhaps a spike for "breaking news" and some subsequent press, has no lasting value and does not meet the notability requirements referenced. Lyncs (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

• Keep - NOTNEWS is quite controversial as Wikipedia is infact built on news. Anyway I think that there are grounds to believe this article should stay on. For example his rejection of a plea etc etc. I say Keep.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

:* "Wikipedia is infact built on news" Tell that to WP:MILHIST or WP:HV, WP:NOTNEWS appears to be controversial only in your own opinion:Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Not News? Bob House 884 (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:PERP. Just another article about a murderer. WP generally does not have articles about every murder. LibStar (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

• Delete WP:PERP and WP:ONEVENT, we aren't a database of bog-standard criminals Bob House 884 (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.