Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Samek (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

=[[Jesse Samek]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Samek}}

:{{la|Jesse Samek}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jesse_Samek_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jesse Samek}})

Not notable IMO, fails WP:SOLDIER. We can't have articles for every soldier or airman killed Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jesse_Samek previous AFD] nominated this for deletion as Wikipedia is not a memorial and the strongest case for this articles inclusion is [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/R?r108:FLD001:S61420 a passing reference] by Congress naming soldiers killed in action. As much as it breaks my heart to say so, this fails WP:SOLDIER per nom. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:10, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. Junior airman who died in a crash. Not notable. Having a temporary camp named after him does not meet the notability bar. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete no substantial notability and fails WP:Soldier and WP:NotMemorial. —  dainomite   15:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.