Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Is: Remix

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jesus Is. No arguments were presented toward notability, but no arguments made that would (by WP:ATD) argue against a merge, limited merge, or redirect. A successful merge will obviously depend on the survival of the merge target, which is also the subject of a deletion discussion. No prejudice against a different redirect if that AfD closes delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

=[[Jesus Is: Remix]]=

:{{la|Jesus Is: Remix}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jesus_Is:_Remix Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jesus Is: Remix}})

Does not meet :WP:NALBUMS. A track listing at AllMusic does not make the album notable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Delete. Non-notable album fails WP:NALBUMS. No significant coverage found in reliable sources. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Delete - Absolutely agree with nom & {{u|Philg88}} - Non notable album with no evidence of notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

::{{ping|Davey2010}} There's a whole bunch more of these by the same group that I haven't got around to checking yet - you can find them through the "Albums and songs" DELSORT above. Cheers, Philg88 ^♦talk 22:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

::: Concur. I have checked many of them and they really don't have any notability. The band is notable. They have some very notable releases, but the nominees here don't have any support. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:19, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Delete. No evidence of independent significant coverage. WWGB (talk) 01:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Comment On 19 June 2014 the nominator PRODed some 50+ Hillsong-related articles see here. From 21 June I noticed this list and that some 10+ of these PRODs were charting albums at either ARIA or Billboard. I have gone through more of the 50+ list and added sources where possible and dePRODed any that I felt had a reliable source for their existence. I was hoping to get time to supply further sources to attempt to establish notability. With so many articles to research this is not necessarily achievable in a short time-frame. The nominator has sent most of the dePRODed articles straight to AfD. I ask for time/assistance in actually searching for sources to support the articles' notability.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Merge with Jesus Is (see my comments on that deletion discussion).--¿3family6 _contribs 20:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.