Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeygopi Panisilvam

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Addhoc (talk) 00:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Jeygopi Panisilvam]]=

{{ns:0|B}}

:{{la|Jeygopi Panisilvam}} ([{{fullurl:Jeygopi Panisilvam|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeygopi Panisilvam}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fairly obvious hoax/nonsense. Apparently he was born in 1933, was killed in 1948, but became leader of his tribe in 1956, after it had dissolved in 1947. Google, Google books, Google Scholar and Google News (since forever) all turn up a blank for his name. The [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Guilmar+tribe&btnG=Search&meta= tribes] mentioned don't seem to exist either. There is a book listed as a reference, but Google Books and Amazon are both unaware of its existence, and [http://calcuttapress.com/ Calcutta Press] seems to exist only as a simple printer. The page history makes interesting reading - I suspect this article was a lunchtime's entertainment for a class of schoolkids. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 14:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per nomination. Kind of sorry I wasn't around to enjoy the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeygopi_Panisilvam&action=history fun]. --jonny-mt 14:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Wikipedia isn't the place for joke articles. ArcAngel (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note - Page has been unprotected. Rudget. 15:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per G3 as a blatant hoax article. DarkAudit (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete And I hear my dinner is ready Plutonium27 (talk) 20:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment the G3 tag I placed for blatant hoax was removed because of the AfD. The AfD does not preclude marking something for speedy if the article so qualifies. this does. DarkAudit (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.