Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiri Priban

:{{la|Jiri Priban}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jiri_Priban Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jiri Priban}})

Notability doesn't seem to be asserted or established Boleyn (talk) 19:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

• Delete, BLPPROD which was just removed should have stayed on the page, still no sources. - filelakeshoe (t / c) 17:00, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
• :Keep after Vejvančický's rewrite - filelakeshoe (t / c) 08:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
• Delete the person's own webpage is not enough sources to justify the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

• Keep, a highly sought-after political commentator, appears regularly in the Czech media. I've expanded the article and added missing sources. Please, note that the profile at the Portal of Czech Literature and the (very interesting) article published by Týden are independent sources covering his career and activities and were not written by him. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
• Keep. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.