Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Hauge

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sahara Forest Project. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:41, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

=[[Joakim Hauge]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Hauge}}

:{{la|Joakim Hauge}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joakim_Hauge Stats])

:({{Find sources|Joakim Hauge}})

Fails the general criterias as of WP:BIO, as well as WP:ACADEMIC. I won't suggest that briefly mentioning in an CNN article justifies an own article. Grrahnbahr (talk) 20:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 September 22. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 21:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment I believe the criterias of WP:BIO is represented by "Creative professionals; people know for orginating a significant new concept, theory or technique" in this chase Hauge is behind the Sahara Forest Project, a new concept working to use the waste from a production phase as a resorce for an other production phase. At the same time "greening the desert".— Preceding unsigned comment added by Selllllo (talk • contribs)

::That's a good idea. Are there any sources that can verify he is an inventor or pioneer or founding father or other such wording? Anything to support he is known for this, not just done it. Sources would need to be independent of Hauge eg. newspaper, magazines. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 19:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:23, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Merge and redirect to Sahara Forest Project. There is some news coverage of Hauge, such as in [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0262407913613184 New Scientist], but it seems to be related primarily to the project. -- 101.119.14.67 (talk) 11:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Merge/Redirect to Sahara Forest Project. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 15:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.