Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JobsBroadway.com

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily Deleted. Non-admin close. LaMenta3 (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[JobsBroadway.com]]=

:{{la|JobsBroadway.com}} ([{{fullurl:JobsBroadway.com|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JobsBroadway.com}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

previously tagged for speedy as a non notable website. AfD may be the more prudent way to go. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment - I was the speedy nominator: I saw this as an article on a non-notable company being written by one of its founders, and failing WP:COMPANY. I don't know why speedy deletion is inferior to AfD in this respect meaning I may have misinterpreted a CSD guideline, and so will await comments before !voting - Fritzpoll (talk) 13:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • The CSD was removed (out of process) by the creator of the article, but with foreign sites for witch there are a lot of google hits (though none seem to be to independent, reliable sources), I prefer to be on the safe side, trying to avoid systematic bias. Someone from the area may come up with some good refs. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 13:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Non-Notable, etc. Speedy delete should have been fine I would have thought. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

:* Speedy Delete per my reasoning above - Fritzpoll (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete. No assertion of notability meets A7 criteria at WP:SPEEDY --JD554 (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete A7/web. No assertation of notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Obviouse speedy... no thought involved. Retagged as such Re-tag removed by User:Phil Bridger saying "has an indication of importance/significance so we should let the AfD run its course"--Pmedema (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. WP:SNOWBALL? --JD554 (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.