Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jobs in Nigeria

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Jobs in Nigeria]]=

:{{la|Jobs in Nigeria}} ([{{fullurl:Jobs in Nigeria|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jobs in Nigeria}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unencyclopedic, WP:ESSAY, likely WP:OR CultureDrone (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

  • delete No nontrivial information. One may substitute the word "Nigeria" for "Zamunda" with no loss of meaning. - 7-bubёn >t 17:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Move and redirectto Employment in Nigeria. Needs to be rewritten in the vein of Employment in Hong Kong, but I believe the subject is notable, if very poorly written and sourced. SMSpivey (talk) 04:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Although the subject of employment in one of the world's fastest growing economies, with about 150 million inhabitants, would be pretty self-evidently notable, this article contains nothing worth salvaging. This is obvious spam for the organisation linked to in the references. It probably merits a WP:CSD#G11 speedy deletion, but since it's been brought to AfD we might as well continue the process and get this deleted by a proper concensus. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.