Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodilly Pendre

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

=[[Jodilly Pendre]]=

:{{la|Jodilly Pendre}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jodilly_Pendre Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jodilly Pendre}})

Prod tag removed that an article was created a day earlier, so it fails ~~WP:N and WP:BIO~~ WP:BLP1E. ApprenticeFan ^work 03:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:As per comment above, it is now changed per policies on WP:BLP1E. ApprenticeFan ^work 07:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

::Again, where in WP:BLP1E says that removing a prod tag a day after its creation is prohibited? –H T D 14:31, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

:Where in WP:N and WP:BIO states that the removal of the prod tag means it is a violation of these two pages? –H T D 16:30, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Weak Keep, while I could see the logic behind WP:BLP1E, one must excuse the non-primary reliable sources which give significant coverage to the individual by [http://www.gmanetwork.com/entertainment/shows/thetimyapshow/videos/2014-09-17/31525/Bonding-with-fashions-newest-It-girl-Jodilly-Pendre GMA], [http://www.interaksyon.com/lifestyle/for-jodilly-pendre-no-turning-back-after-winning-1st-runner-up-at-asias-next-top-model-cycle-2 InterAksyon], and [http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/lifestyle/04/10/14/whats-next-jodilly-katarina-after-asntm ABS-CBN]. Although I would like there to be stronger sources, the subject has received significant coverage outside of AsNTM, and thus shouldn't be deleted unless a stronger case can be made.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Those are the 3 largest TV networks in the Philippines. You could no longer find stronger sources than those. –H T D 02:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.