Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Cunnane
=[[Joe Cunnane]]=
:{{la|Joe Cunnane}} – (
:({{Find sources|Joe Cunnane}})
Doesn't meet WP:GAA or WP:AFL notability guidelines Gnevin (talk) 17:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:23, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. —The-Pope (talk) 13:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:NSPORT Generally acceptable standards "participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level such as the Olympics". In this case, Cunnane played for the Ireland national Australian rules football team, which is the highest level of competition for Australian rules football. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- 'Keep: Per BrownHairedGirl, he appears to meet WP:NSPORT . The tournament he participated in is the major international event for the sport. (Australia is prohibited from participating in it.) The competition does get media attention, and Cunnane has received mentions as a result. See [http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/08/23/1030052975335.html The Age]. He's also been mentioned on the AFL's website [http://www.afl.com.au/More/PlayAFL/International/InternationalCup2011/IC11IrishSquad/tabid/18013/Default.aspx here] and [http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/118997/default.aspx here]. --LauraHale (talk) 05:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete the AFL International Cup is purely a development league played by amateurs and is a much lower level of play than most suburban leagues, it is nowhere near the "highest level of competition for Australian rules football". None of the references provided are significant coverage in major independent reliable sources. The-Pope (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SilkTork ✔Tea time 01:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.