Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Fonti
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Mojo Hand (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
=[[:Joe Fonti]]=
:{{la|1=Joe Fonti}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Joe Fonti}})
WP:TOOSOON for an article as I am unable to find enough in-depth coverage of this Australian rules footballer to meet WP:GNG. The closest to WP:SIGCOV I found was a few sentences of coverage [https://thewest.com.au/sport/afl/claremont-product-joe-fonti-to-make-gws-debut-in-massive-test-against-carlton--c-15253039 here] interspersed between some quotes, and [https://www.zerohanger.com/giants-make-call-on-veterans-future-youngster-commits-154838/ this] routine transactional announcement. JTtheOG (talk) 06:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Australia. JTtheOG (talk) 06:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Too soon, not enough sources that fit the GNG criteria. GMH Melbourne (talk) 23:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
:: Changing my vote to Keep, the presence of the West Australian articles and the Cairns Post article should satisfy nSport. GMH Melbourne (talk) 22:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: doing a decent WP:BEFORE check is difficult these days with the major Aussie papers going behind paywalls, but Newsbank had 3 items of significant coverage from independent sources, which I've added to the article. The-Pope (talk) 03:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep verging on speedy. Nom fails to explain why this should be deleted when a clear alternative to deletion exists in redirecting to List of Greater Western Sydney Giants players. Plus keep per his holiness's improvement. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- : TOOSOON directly suggests draftification. Two of the three third-party sources ostensibly cover the same event while the third has some four sentences of independent coverage. JTtheOG (talk) 01:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- :: If TOOSOON directly suggests draftification then why did you nominate for deletion? Plus I'd rather go with a policy that has a sensible outcome than an essay that has a pointless outcome. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- ::: Because draftification is a possible outcome of an AfD? JTtheOG (talk) 01:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep on review, coverage of Fonti in The West Australian and The Cairns Post satisfies GNG. – Teratix ₵ 07:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.