Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Rogan: Talking Monkeys in Space

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Joe Rogan. No prejudice against merging some of the content. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Joe Rogan: Talking Monkeys in Space]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Joe Rogan: Talking Monkeys in Space}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Joe Rogan: Talking Monkeys in Space}})

Been a stub for 10 years, not notable, fails WP:GNG. No articles link here except navigation bar Template:Joe Rogan, making it effectively an orphan.

Content should be placed into Joe Rogan, if appropriate. Re-point the associated redirects Talking Monkeys in Space and Talking Monkeys In Space to Joe Rogan. Platonk (talk) 19:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep Stub and orphan are not valid deletion reasons. It can be de-orphaned if linked from Joe Rogan or another article. Aside from that, the topic does seem to meet GNG judging by the sources in the refs section, but not by a lot. Not opposed to a merge however. Waddles 🗩 🖉 21:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Merge to Joe Rogan. Insufficient independent notability for a standalone article. Polyamorph (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

  • Merge with Joe Rogan: Although it might technically meet GNG, it probably would serve better if it was merged. The references and external links have more content than the actual article. bop34talkcontribs 13:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Merge with Joe Rogan. The article is only a very short one and does not contain much information, and a merge should not be difficult. If, as the nominator says, the article has been a stub for ten years, it seems unlikely it will be expanded. YTKJ (talk) 19:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Merge with and/or redirect to Joe Rogan. There is enough sourcing to write about it underneath Rogan's page, but I don't think it's quite notable enough for its own page owing to the relative dearth of coverage. The current page doesn't have much material to begin with, so writing the material on Rogan's biography page from scratch might be better than merging outright. — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.