Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Wolemonwu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Joe Wolemonwu]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Joe Wolemonwu}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Joe Wolemonwu}})

Impressive article, but upon checking there is very little to be found about him. The main source, [https://www.theafricandream.net/dr-joe-wolemonwu-releases-a-new-book-titled-team-lead-model-of-self-leadership/ this article], reads like a press release and is labeled a "filed contribution". There are no sources at all in Google News and very few in Google in general (searched both with "Joe" and with" Joseph"). [https://www.proquest.com/openview/48870af000f13783081ea0fe1f780733/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y This] is the only thing I find on Google Scholar, and it hasn't been cited yet by anyone apparently, so WP:NPROF isn't met. Fram (talk) 12:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Virginia. Fram (talk) 12:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete. Apparently self-published books seldom grant WP:NAUTHOR notability. There is a brief bit about one of his books in the DSS Access source, and a review on TheAfricanDream.net, but I am skeptical that either of these is the kind of review talked about by the NAUTHOR guideline, and in any case it is less than we have looked for in past deletion discussions. I see absolutely no sign of WP:NPROF, and little sign of GNG. The article strikes me as rather promotional. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:38, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Russ Woodroofe. Given the way the article is written I believe the article might qualify for speedy deletion under WP:G11. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

:: Update: I have tagged the article for a CSD under G11 given how promotional the prose is. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

  • Delete - the G11 was removed, but this COI/UPE article is highly promotional about a person who does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR.Onel5969 TT me 01:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.