Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Begg (Metal Expert)
=[[John Begg (Metal Expert)]]=
:{{la|John Begg (Metal Expert)}} – (
:({{Find sources|John Begg (Metal Expert)}})
AFD template added with the comment "Non-notable entry"; AFD nom not completed, but the debate seems to have started anyway, so I'm placing the afd2 template here and adding this to the log. Hairhorn (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
::Sorry I was called away. The article reads like a CV and makes no claim to notability. No books, cited articles, invented alloys etc. One source says he found a body. Google shows no notable hits for him I can find. Victuallers (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
:It was not written by him and this man has done more research and I am going to make the article longer in the future FreddyBlogs22 (talk) 18:33, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable resume with no reliable sources.TeapotgeorgeTalk 09:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence this fulfills a criterion of WP:PROF and the mention in the newspaper article is trivial. Hekerui (talk) 13:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A7/person with no notability presented, and while "FreddyBlogs22" claims the article wasn't written by the subject he also claims the super-close-up picture is his own work. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable. GregJackP Boomer! 04:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet WP:BIO. Use of the term "expert" aside, this article really contains no assertion of notability. --Kinu t/c 08:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.