Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Caslin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[John Caslin]]=

:{{la|John Caslin}} ([{{fullurl:John Caslin|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Caslin}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Likely non-notable author. Only souce given states :

"As a Prestige and performance car enthusiast and owner as well as a resident at motoring.co.uk, John has a wealth of experience and knowledge to impart. He regularly updates his car blog with news and reviews that affect the performance and prestige car owner."

I don't see this passing notability requirements Passportguy (talk) 15:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete as sources don't exist to provide in-depth coverage to establish notability. Drawn Some (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. I have a blog, can I have an article too? Niteshift36 (talk) 06:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - article is almost content free with a very tenuous claim to notability with no independent sourcing provided nor could I find any myself. - Whpq (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

* Speedy keep. Failure to follow WP:BEFORE should be considered a violation of WP:CIVIL and against WP:CONSENSUS. A discussion among the people who happen to come here is inadequate. Use the talk page and give it an adequate period of time before deletion. -- Biaswarrior (talk) 19:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Checkuser confirmed sock. J.delanoygabsadds 19:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment, Above users only edits have been to vote "Keep" on AfD's, and remove ProD's. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.