Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Early (author)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. asserting that one is a self published author is not a valid assertion of significance. There can be exceptions, but they have to be demonstrated. DGG ( talk ) 08:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

=[[:John Early (author)]]=

:{{la|John Early (author)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Early_(author) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|John Early (author)}})

Declined speedy since there is a source, but nevertheless I dfon't think this character passes WP:GNG. One swallow does not a summer make. Incidentally, judging by the name of the creating editor, this is an autobiography. Rarely a good sign. TheLongTone (talk) 13:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete. The CBC source is certainly a step up from the kind of crap that self-promoting WP:AUTOBIO editors usually try to pass off as sourcing, but it's still not enough as WP:GNG requires multiple reliable sources and not just one. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when there's a stronger claim of notability than "he exists" and better sourcing than just one piece of local coverage in his own hometown media, but Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which a writer or a musician is automatically entitled to an article just because he exists. Bearcat (talk) 19:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete the fact he is self-published mitiagates against getting to notability, and nothing in the sources moves us closer. Wikipedia is not a book promoting venue.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable author. Thelmz (talk) 12:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.