Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John a bell

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7 Tone 16:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[John a bell]]=

:{{la|John a bell}} ([{{fullurl:John a bell|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John a bell}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Failed mayoral candidate with some trival coverage as a listing on IMDB as an extra. fails WP:BIO. Article was already deleted once but since I can't see the content, I don't know if it's a CSD case. Cameron Scott (talk) 09:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

John a bell was not a failed candidate. His positions were requested by 2 elected councillors and the mayor. His coverage was not trivial, as it was featured in major newspapers and television. His movie titles are the same as any other candidate. This Cameron Scott fellow has some racist or bias towards john a bell. It sickens me that some one of this type has leverage over a true account of a minor celebrity. If running an environmentally friendly paper free campaign, which garnered 2027 votes is a failure, then this pedia is a farce. Has this "judge" Cameron Scott received this type of attention? Has he worked 4 months on a feature length film? BIGOTRY by wikipedia is here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John bell wiki (talk • contribs) 09:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete also possible COI in comment above. Just not notable--Moloch09 (talk) 11:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete The author fails to prove notability and it is obviously autobiographical. LittleOldMe (talk) 09:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete came in 5th in a city election. Extremely non-notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.