Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Keyser

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Johnny Keyser]]=

:{{la|Johnny Keyser}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Johnny_Keyser Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Johnny Keyser}})

Reason Smartwater123 (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

The artist no longer goes under the name Johnny Keyser. He now goes under John.K. His wikipedia has been created for John.K and there is no need to have Johnny Keyser.

  • Surely in that case the best thing to do is to update the article with any sourced info from the new article John.k that is not already in Johnny Keyser, and then delete the new article and move the current article to that title. Or is it better to merge the info from the old article into the new one and redirect, to save edit histories of both articles? The problem is that the new article has been edited pretty extensively by different people, so simply deleting it as a copy and moving the old one to that title would remove that edit history. --bonadea contributions talk 07:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete both :Johnny Keyser and :John.k: Two similar promotional articles created for an unsuccessful talent show competitor. An EP which reached no.46 on the Top Heatseekers album chart does not appear to be enough for :WP:CHART and I am not seeing evidence of attained notability, whether by :WP:MUSICBIO or :WP:BASIC. AllyD (talk) 08:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete both. Fails WP:GNG and does not meet WP:NMUSIC. Onel5969 TT me 02:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: John.k page watchers weren't properly notified. Adding template there and relisting for a week.

:{{la|John.k}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 03:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete.k. both, with apologies to Jennifer Lopez, but her prediction has not yet come true.--Milowent.k • has changedhis name for this AfD 04:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete musician who has not attained any of the notability guidelines set out in our notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:37, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable musician.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.