Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Kedrowski
=[[Jon Kedrowski]]=
:{{la|Jon Kedrowski}} – (
:({{Find sources|Jon Kedrowski}})
I'm not a climber, and don't know whether there's a salvageable subject under all the fluff the subject has added to "his" article (I'm pretty confident his trophy case from high school basketball could go). Orange Mike | Talk 23:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't know what this AfD is doing in the academics' section, but a GS h-index of 4 certainly fails WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC).
- Keep per WP:GNG, multiple reliable sources discuss the topic in depth. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 03:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Notable as an adventurer, though not as a writer or academic. There is coverage in reliable sources including Denver Post (one of the USA's bigger papers), CNN, various local press (not all Colorado:[http://www.yakimaherald.com/sports/793604-8/a-climb-becomes-life-or-death][http://blog.thenewstribune.com/adventure/2012/05/21/central-washington-professor-among-survivors-after-deadly-weekend-on-mount-everest/]), and Denver TV news websites, both of his Colorado exploits and Everest climb. Feel free to delete the trivia, though. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Information about the subject is Historical and Valuable to the Climbing Community. He is a well-known figure in the world of mountaineering, geography, and speaking. Everest too. Additional reliable sources added and they discuss the topic in depth. -- ChrisJones25 (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.