Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Rendell

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

=[[Jon Rendell]]=

:{{la|Jon Rendell}} ([{{fullurl:Jon Rendell|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Rendell}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This article about a photographer does not provide any evidence for notability, such as the winning of notable awards or any independent commentary. Grahame (talk) 07:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. talk) 07:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. — Jenafalt (talk) 10:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete No evidence provided around notability, and hard to find any via usual sources. I also note that the subject appears to have contributed a deal of the content. Murtoa (talk) 02:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Completely non-notable fails WP:BIO and all that. JBsupreme (talk) 08:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete, doubtlessly a skilled photographer, but would not appear to meet the WP:BIO notability criteria. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.